Trial (1978)

The police bring the accused into the courtroom.

Enter the judge and assessors.

The judge declares the court session open.

The Clerk of the court announces the witnesses present.

The witnesses are sent to the witness room, where they will wait for a call to testify.

The chairman of the court finds out all the data concerning the defendants.

The composition of the court is presented.

The judge reads out the preliminary testimony of the accused in the case, which he refused at the court session.

The prosecutor demands to announce the examination data.

The results of the examination confirming the preliminary testimony were announced.

The participants of the meeting had no questions or comments.

The second defendant testified in the case.

The victim in the case was called to testify.

The victim is warned about the responsibility for giving false testimony and gives a subscription about it.

The chairman of the court asks questions to the victim.

The conclusion of the medical examiner is announced, characterizing the injury of the victim, the severity of the injuries.

The participants of the meeting had no questions or comments about the expert's conclusion.

The prosecutor continues the interrogation of the victim.

The prosecutor asks the accused a question.

The Chairman of the court summons the second victim to testify.

The court conducted an interrogation of the second victim.

The conclusion of the medical examiner is announced, characterizing the injury of the second victim, the severity of the injuries.

The court proceeds to the interrogation of witnesses.

The first witness is called.

The Chairman of the court establishes the identity of the witness, warns of responsibility for refusing testimony and for giving false testimony.

Interrogation of a witness.

The prosecutor asks questions to the accused and the witness.

The public prosecutor asks questions to the witness.

The Chairman of the court invites the accused to ask questions to the witness.

The accused refuse.

The defense lawyer of one of the accused asks questions to the witness.

Interrogation of the next witness.

The interrogation of the called witness takes place in the same order as the previous one.

Interrogation of a witness by the chairman of the court.

During the court session, the lawyer asks the defendant a question.

The issue of detention of the accused is being discussed.

The lawyer filed a motion to consider the testimony of a witness who was absent from the meeting for a good reason.

The testimony can positively characterize the accused Alekhine.

The characteristics of the accused from the place of work were heard.

A certificate from a medical institution about the cost of treatment of victims was heard.

The participants of the trial were interviewed on the issue of additions to the judicial investigation.

Petitions were made by the victims in the case.

The Court proceeds to the judicial debate.

On the recommendation of the prosecutor, the public prosecutor is the first to speak in the debate.

The prosecutor acts to support the state prosecution.

The prosecutor comprehensively characterized the criminal actions of the defendants and their personalities.

Finishing the speech, the prosecutor demanded to punish the defendants according to the relevant articles of the law.

The victims file civil lawsuits.

The lawyer of the defendant Alekhine makes a defensive speech.

The court provides an opportunity for the defendant Fateev to make a defensive speech.

The defendant refuses.

The participants of the meeting are invited to make a remark.

The participants refuse, as well as written proposals on the merits of the charge.

The defendants are presented with the last word.

The court is removed to decide the verdict.

The court announces the verdict.

The court clarified the time limits for appealing the verdict.

The court session is declared closed.

The film shows the main content of each part of the trial and the procedural order of judicial actions.